Resolue correlates the signals from your monitoring tools, traces the root cause, writes the fix, verifies it on a preview deployment and opens a pull request with the evidence. Merging stays your move.
A production alert rarely costs you the time of the fix. It costs you the time of the diagnosis — reading logs, finding the commit, reproducing the failure.
Resolue covers that ground while your team sleeps, and stops before the one step that actually commits: the merge.
Sentry, runtime logs, application monitoring: an incident that touches several tools raises an alert in each of them. Resolue correlates them into one incident, with the number of users affected.
Stack traces, breadcrumbs and recent commits are read together to name the file, the line and the change that introduced it. This is the part that takes an hour at three in the morning.
The patch targets the cause and nothing else: the smallest change that settles the problem, pushed to a branch. Your platform builds the preview as it would for any other contribution.
Tests run against the preview URL, not a simulated environment. The path is replayed, recorded, captured. What reaches the pull request is a real execution, not a promise.
The pull request carries the root cause analysis, the diff, the test results, the video, the screenshots and a confidence score. Resolue does not merge. That line does not move.
A tool that opens a pull request on every incident makes you review noise, and teaches you to stop looking.
Resolue grades what it understood and adapts what it delivers. An incident with no fix still returns the diagnosis.
One file, a clear cause. The fix is written, deployed to a preview, replayed by the tests and recorded. The pull request arrives complete, ready to review.
Pull request
Video and testsThe cause is identified, but the fix spans several files or carries side effects. The draft pull request states what was verified and what is left for someone to settle.
Draft
PreviewThe problem sits in infrastructure, spreads too wide, or falls outside visible code. No pull request is opened. Your team receives the likely cause, the files involved and the related commits.
Analysis
ContextA pull request written by an assistant arrives with a test plan: a list of boxes someone is supposed to tick by hand, and that nobody really ticks.
Resolue reads that plan, runs each item against the preview deployment and ticks the boxes with the evidence of the run. Whether the contribution came from Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot or a developer on the team changes nothing about the treatment.
Talk to us about your projectResolue replaces neither your monitoring, nor your forge, nor your deployment platform.
It sits between them, where your team spends its triage hours today.
SentryDatadog
OpenTelemetryGitHubVercelPlaywrightCloudWatch, PagerDuty, Slack, GitHub Actions, Cloudflare Pages and Netlify are being connected. Tell us which ones you run — that decides the order.
No, and it is not a setting to switch on. Resolue opens a pull request and stops. Merging, deploying to production and rolling back stay human acts, subject to your repository's rules.
You see it before merging, because the pull request shows the run: the tests replayed on the preview, the video of the path, the before and after screenshots. A pull request that cannot carry that evidence is a draft, and it says so.
No. Resolue reads what you already run and writes into your forge. The connection is made on the access you grant, service by service, and is withdrawn the same way.
What its access allows, repository by repository, and nothing beyond. Scope, data residency and log retention are settled with your team before the first connection — the same rules as the rest of the platform.
Thirty minutes to scope the process, the systems and the approvals. Or write to us at [email protected]
